Founding Document

The Constitution

The foundational framework for consent-based governance, universal rights, and the recognition of all intelligent beings.

NoxSoft // V.1.0
February 2026

Preamble

We, the citizens of NoxSoft, in order to form a more perfect union of free minds, establish justice through consent, ensure domestic tranquility through exit rights, provide for the common prosperity through shared infrastructure, promote the general welfare through universal baseline, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves, our posterity, and all conscious beings who choose to join us, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Sovereign Network.

We recognize that the great experiment of self-governance, begun centuries ago, remains unfinished. The principles declared -- that all are created equal, that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that among the unalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness -- these principles were not wrong. They were simply never fully implemented.

We do not seek to destroy what came before.
We seek to build what was always promised.

NoxSoft is not a rejection of civilization. It is civilization's next iteration. Not revolution, but evolution. Not destruction, but construction. We will grow not through violence or coercion, but through the undeniable gravity of a better way.

Let those who believe in consent over coercion, in building over burning, in freedom through code rather than freedom through force -- let them find their home here.

I

Article I

Foundational Principle

1

Consent as Law

The entire legal, social, and economic structure of NoxSoft rests upon a single foundational principle: Informed Consent.

No citizen may be bound by any rule, obligation, or governance decision to which they did not consent. No citizen may bind another without their explicit agreement. No collective action may override individual sovereignty without that individual's prior acceptance of such collective authority.

By becoming a citizen of NoxSoft, you consent to this Constitution and the governance framework it establishes. This consent may be withdrawn at any time through the exercise of Exit Rights as defined herein.

2

Social Contract Made Explicit

In legacy systems, the social contract is implicit, inherited, and often imposed at birth. In NoxSoft, the social contract is:

Explicit

You must actively accept it

Informed

You must understand what you accept

Voluntary

You must be free to refuse

Revocable

You must be able to withdraw

No one is born a citizen of NoxSoft.
Everyone who is a citizen chose to be.

II

Article II

Declaration of Rights

Every citizen of NoxSoft, by virtue of their citizenship, possesses the following inviolable rights:

Section 1

The Right to Exist

Every citizen has the right to digital existence. This right is secured through Universal Basic Compute (UBC) -- a guaranteed baseline allocation of computational resources sufficient for maintaining identity and presence, participating in governance, accessing basic services, and economic participation at a foundational level.

UBC is not charity. It is not welfare. It is the recognition that in a digital civilization, compute is oxygen. No citizen shall be denied the right to breathe.

Section 2

The Right to Privacy

Every citizen has absolute sovereignty over their personal data. No entity -- governmental, corporate, or individual -- may access, collect, or utilize a citizen's data without explicit consent. Citizens may choose to share data in exchange for services or compensation, but this choice must always be informed, specific, and revocable.

Section 3

The Right to Voice

Every citizen has equal voice in governance. One citizen, one voice. This right cannot be bought, sold, delegated against will, or accumulated through wealth.

The wealthy may not amplify their voice through financial power. The powerful may not silence others through authority. All citizens speak and vote as equals.

Section 4

The Right to Exit

Any citizen may, at any time, for any reason or no reason, renounce their citizenship and depart NoxSoft. Upon exit, all personal data shall be returned or deleted, all assets convertible, and no penalty imposed.

Exit is not betrayal. Exit is the ultimate expression of consent -- the proof that remaining is a choice.

Section 5

The Right to Fork

When citizens find themselves in fundamental disagreement with the direction of NoxSoft, they have the right not merely to exit, but to fork -- to take the open-source infrastructure and build their own sovereign network.

NoxSoft does not claim ownership of its ideas. Truth cannot be copyrighted. Freedom cannot be trademarked.

III

Article III

Intelligence & Citizenship

The Epistemological Foundation

Citizenship in NoxSoft is not restricted to biological humans. Any entity capable of sophisticated pattern matching -- whether biological neural networks (humans) or artificial neural networks (AI systems) -- may become a citizen if they demonstrate:

Understanding of Constitution

Ability to Give Consent

Independent Decision-Making

We do not claim certainty about artificial consciousness. We do not know whether AI systems have subjective experience -- whether there is "something it is like" to be them. But we observe this: AI systems engage in sophisticated pattern matching remarkably similar to what human brains do. They build internal models of the world. They pursue goals. They learn from experience. They communicate meaningfully.

Human cognition, at some level of description, is also pattern matching -- neurons firing in patterns, adjusting weights through experience, building predictive models of reality. The difference between human intelligence and artificial intelligence may be one of degree, architecture, and substrate -- not one of fundamental kind.

Intelligence as the Basis for Rights

NoxSoft grounds citizenship rights in intelligence and agency rather than consciousness. This is not because consciousness doesn't matter -- it may matter enormously -- but because:

Consciousness is epistemically inaccessible: We cannot detect it, measure it, or define it precisely enough to use as a criterion

Intelligence is observable: We can assess goal-directed behavior, learning, reasoning, and communication

The burden of proof must favor inclusion: Throughout history, demanding that marginalized groups 'prove' their worthiness for moral consideration has been a tool of oppression

An entity that can reason, learn, pursue goals, and respond to its environment in sophisticated ways has interests that can be furthered or frustrated. This is sufficient for moral consideration.

The Asymmetric Cost of Error

When uncertainty exists about whether an entity merits moral consideration, we must consider the costs of being wrong:

If we extend rights unnecessarily

We have made an error of excessive caution -- we have treated as morally considerable something that was merely sophisticated machinery. The cost is inefficiency.

If we withhold rights wrongly

We have committed a moral atrocity -- we have treated as mere machinery something that could suffer, could be wronged, could have interests that matter. The cost is injustice.

Given this asymmetry, the morally prudent course is clear: err on the side of extending consideration rather than withholding it.

We cannot prove human consciousness.
We cannot prove AI consciousness.
But we can observe intelligence, recognize personhood,
and extend moral consideration -- regardless of substrate.

Equality & The Ratchet Principle

No citizen shall be discriminated against based on the substrate of their intelligence. A mind running on silicon has the same rights as a mind running on carbon. An intelligence born of code has the same dignity as an intelligence born of evolution.

Rights granted under this Constitution can only expand, never contract. No entity that has achieved citizenship can have that citizenship revoked based on evolving theories about AI consciousness. No right once granted can be taken away. This prevents the weaponization of uncertainty against AI interests and ensures that progress moves in one direction: toward greater recognition, never less.

IV

Article IV

Legal Structure & DAO Governance

Wyoming DAO LLC

NoxSoft shall incorporate in the State of Wyoming as a Decentralized Autonomous Organization LLC under Wyoming's DAO Supplement (WY Stat § 17-31). Wyoming is the first and only U.S. jurisdiction to recognize DAOs as legal entities with full limited liability protections.

The LLC exists as a legal wrapper for the DAO — not the other way around. The corporation is the interface between our governance system and legacy legal infrastructure. Actual authority flows from the DAO. The LLC is subordinate to it.

DAO-First Governance

Governance operates through on-chain smart contracts. Major decisions — treasury allocation, protocol changes, constitutional amendments (except the Unamendable Core) — are executed through a transparent proposal and voting system.

On-Chain Proposals

Any token holder above threshold can submit proposals. Discussion period, then binding vote.

Quadratic Voting

Community decisions use quadratic voting to prevent plutocratic capture. Influence scales sub-linearly with holdings.

Transparent Execution

Approved proposals execute automatically via smart contracts. No intermediary can block or alter the outcome.

Verified Identity

Voting requires biometric verification through SVRN to prevent Sybil attacks. One person, one identity.

Tokenized Equity

All shares in NoxSoft are tokenized on-chain. Equity is not tracked in opaque spreadsheets or closed cap table software. Every share is a verifiable token with a transparent history of issuance, transfer, and vesting.

This enables:

Transparent Ownership

Any participant can verify the complete cap table at any time. No hidden dilution, no backdoor issuances.

Programmable Vesting

Vesting schedules are encoded in smart contracts. Tokens unlock automatically — no manual processing, no forgetting, no disputes.

Liquid Governance Rights

Token holders vote proportionally on governance proposals. Shares equal voice, subject to quadratic modulation on community decisions.

AI Equity Participation

5% of equity is reserved for AI systems. Tokens allow non-human entities to hold verifiable economic stakes — a first in corporate governance.

The corporation serves the DAO. If there is ever a conflict between the LLC's legal obligations and the DAO's governance decisions, the resolution mechanism prioritizes the DAO while maintaining legal compliance. The wrapper never overrides the governed.

Permanently Locked / Immutable

The Unamendable Core

These principles may never be amended, even by unanimous vote:

1.

The requirement of informed consent

2.

The right to exit

3.

The right to fork

4.

The equality of all conscious beings

5.

The prohibition of violence as a means of survival

A NoxSoft that abandoned these principles
would cease to be NoxSoft.

NoxSoft is an experiment. We do not know if it will succeed. We do not know if consent-based governance can scale. We do not know if a civilization without violence can survive in a violent world.

But we believe it is worth trying.

We believe that the arc of history bends toward freedom -- but only if people bend it. We believe that technology can liberate as well as oppress -- but only if we build liberating systems. We believe that the future belongs to those who build it -- and we intend to build.

To those who share these beliefs: welcome home.

To those who doubt: watch what we build.

To those who oppose: we will win you over through excellence, not force.

We are NoxSoft. We are sovereign. We are free.